🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume nuclear talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations was effective, and revealed new appeals had originated from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Path

The foreign minister is treading a difficult course since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been obliterated. Following this, European countries exercised their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Offered

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated repeatedly they had reached agreement with the US representative the US official only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Iran's diplomats stated the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in various formats if negotiations restart.

Trump recently claimed he had been getting signals that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his speech to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of international law, Araghchi declared the 12-day war demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He stated the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Negotiations Remains the Final Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was America and the European states that had consistently attempted to dictate their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the ultimate solution to address disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and respect, they will get a reply in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the face of this invasion."